4.1 Article

Expression of the ELAV-like protein HuR in the cytoplasm is associated with endometrial carcinoma progression

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 11939-11947

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2485-9

关键词

Endometrial carcinoma; Ishikawa cell; Human antigen R; shRNA; ER-alpha

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30973189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human antigen R (HuR) is an mRNA-binding factor that belongs to the embryonic lethal abnormal vision/Hu protein family which may function as a tumor maintenance gene in a variety of carcinomas. However, there is no study to analyze HuR expression in endometrial carcinoma. Here, we investigated the expression of HuR in endometrial carcinoma carcinogenesis and subsequent progression. The expression of HuR and estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) protein was examined by immunohistochemistry on paraffin embedding specimens containing endometrial carcinoma and adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Short hairpin RNA against HuR was transfected to investigate the role of HuR in regulating the expression of ER-alpha and progression in endometrial carcinoma. Cell viability and cycle were measured using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and flow cytometry, respectively. Apoptosis was examined by annexin Vapoptosis assay. Our study result show that cytoplasmic HuR expression is more frequent in poorly differentiated carcinomas (p= 0.005), advanced stage (p= 0.020), and positive ER-alpha expression (p= 0.026). Three HuR short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) were transfected into Ishikawa cells, and we selected the most effective shRNA for the following experiments. After the transfection, the ER-alpha protein level was decreased. Further, decreased expression of HuR resulted in the inhibition of proliferation and induced apoptosis in Ishikawa cells. Our results showed that HuR could be a causal factor of ER-alpha regulation in Ishikawa cells and thus may induce the hormone-dependent endometrial carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据