4.1 Article

Expression of the molecular chaperone αB-crystallin in infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas and the significance thereof: an immunohistochemical and proteomics-based strategy

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 2279-2288

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-012-0490-4

关键词

alpha B-Crystallin; Infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas; Tumor marker; Mass spectrometry

类别

资金

  1. le Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. le Ministere de la Sante Publique de la Republique Tunisienne
  3. Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (Strasbourg, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate alpha B-crystallin expression in infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas (IDCAs), as well as, its prognostic significance. Using a two-dimensional electrophoresis matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry investigation coupled to an immunohistochemical approach, we have assessed the expression of alpha B-crystallin in IDCAs, as well as, in other types of breast tumors (invasive lobular carcinomas, medullary carcinomas, and in situ ductal carcinomas). Correlation between alpha B-crystallin expression and clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer has also been investigated. Proteomic analyses revealed an increased expression of alpha B-crystallin in IDCA tumors compared to adjacent nontumor tissues. Overexpression of this molecular chaperone was further confirmed in 51 tumor specimens. Statistical analyses revealed, however, no significant correlations between alpha B-crystallin expression and clinicopathological parameters of the disease (tumor stage, patient age, hormone receptors, SBR grade, and lymph node metastases). This study demonstrates the upregulation of alpha B-crystallin in IDCA tissues which may highlight its possible involvement in breast cancer development. Our findings do not, however, support the involvement of this molecular chaperone in the progression of this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据