4.2 Article

Evolution and role of corded cell aggregation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 93, 期 6, 页码 690-698

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.08.003

关键词

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Cording; Corded cell aggregation; Culture growth characteristics

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2010-20160, BIO2005-07949-C0202]
  2. CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, programa CRP-TB
  3. Spanish Ministry of Health [FIS PI080785]
  4. National Plan I_D_I FIS [CM06/00123]
  5. European Community's 7th Framework Programme [200999]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution and role of corded cell aggregation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures according to growth time and conditions. Thus, in standard culture using aerated 7H9 Middlebrook broth supplemented with 0.05% Tween 80, a dramatic CFU decrease was observed at the end of the exponential phase. This phase was followed by a stable stationary phase that led to dissociation between the optical density ( O.D.) and CFU values, together with the formation of opaque colonies in solid culture. Further analysis revealed that this was due to cording. Scanning electron microscopy showed that cording led to the formation of very stable coiled structures and corded cell aggregations which proved impossible to disrupt by any of the physical means tested. Modulation of cording with a high but non-toxic concentration of Tween 80 led to a slower growth rate, avoidance of a sudden drop-off to the stationary phase, the formation of weaker cording structures and the absence of opaque colonies, together with a lower survival at later time-points. An innovative automated image analysis technique has been devised to characterize the cording process. This analysis has led to important practical consequences for the elaboration of M. tuberculosis inocula and suggests the importance of biofilm formation in survival of the bacilli in the extracellular milieu. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据