4.2 Article

Suppression of IFNγ plus mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan-induced NO by IL-4 is due to decreased IRF-1 expression

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 294-303

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.03.004

关键词

Lipoarabinomannan; Nitric oxide; Interleukin-4; Inducible nitric oxide synthase; Interferon-gamma; Transcriptional regulation

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. Veterans Health Administration
  3. Office of Research and Development (EDC)
  4. [N01-Al-75320]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In mice, and possibly in humans, nitric oxide (NO) is an important host-defense molecule against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and NO are upregulated in murine macrophages stimulated with interferon-gamma (IFN gamma) and mannose-capped lipoarabinomannan (ManLAM), a major lipoglycan in the cell wall of M. tuberculosis. Interleukin-4 (IL-4) can inhibit NO expression and may impair host immune response to M. tuberculosis. Therefore, we sought to determine the mechanism by which IL-4 inhibits IFN gamma + ManLAM-induced NO production. Since L-arginine is the substrate for both iNOS and arginase, and IL-4 increases arginase activity by inducing its production, a plausible mechanism of IL-4 inhibition of NO expression is via depletion of L-arginine through increased arginase activity. Herein, we show that IL-4 inhibited iNOS gene expression at the transcriptional level, suggesting an inhibitory mechanism that is independent of the competition for L-arginine between iNOS and arginase. Furthermore, pharmacologic inhibition of IL-4-induced arginase activity did not abrogate IL-4 inhibition of IFN gamma + ManLAM-induced NO expression. Instead, inhibition by IL-4 was mediated principally by the ability of IL-4 to inhibit the production of IFN gamma-induced interferon-gamma response factor-1 (IRF-1) protein, a critically important transcriptional element that enhances expression of IFN gamma-inducible genes such as iNOS. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据