4.3 Article

Costs and outcomes of VCT delivery models in the context of scaling up services in Indonesia

期刊

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 193-199

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02675.x

关键词

cost analysis; voluntary counselling and testing; injecting drug user; HIV/AIDS; Indonesia

资金

  1. European Commission [318/10150A - EC SANTE/2005/105-033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To evaluate costs and outcomes of voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) service delivery models in urban Indonesia. METHODS We collected primary data on utilization, costs and outcomes of VCT services in a hospital clinic (568 clients), HIV community clinic (28 clients), sexually transmitted infection (STI) community clinic (784 clients) and prison clinic (574 clients) in Bandung, Indonesia, in the period January 2008-April 2009. RESULTS The hospital clinic diagnosed the highest proportion and absolute number of HIV infections, but with the lowest average CD4 cell count and with the highest associated travelling and waiting time. The prison clinic detected fewer cases, but at an earlier stage, and all enrolled in HIV care. The community clinics detected the smallest number of cases, and only 0-8% enrolled in HIV care. The unit cost per VCT was highest in the hospital clinic (US$74), followed by the STI community clinic (US$65), the HIV community clinic (US$39) and the prison (US$23). CONCLUSION We propose a reorientation of the delivery models for VCT and related HIV/AIDS treatment in this setting. We call for the scaling up of community clinics for VCT to improve access, promote earlier detection and to perform (early) treatment activities. This would reduce the burden of the hospital clinic to orient itself towards the treatment of AIDS patients. This is one of very few studies addressing this issue in Asia and the first of its kind in Indonesia, which has a rapidly growing HIV epidemic. The conceptual framework and overall conclusions may be relevant to other low-income settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据