“Spin” in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes

Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer

(2013) F. E. Vera-Badillo et al.   ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer

(2012) Abdullah K. Altwairgi et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Implementation of a publication strategy in the context of reporting biases. A case study based on new documents from Neurontin® litigation

(2012) S Swaroop Vedula et al.   Trials

The EU's system for regulating medical devices

(2012) P. McCulloch   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes

(2010) Isabelle Boutron   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Factors Associated with Results and Conclusions of Trials of Thiazolidinediones

(2009) Gail Rattinger et al.   PLoS One

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals

(2008) Otavio Berwanger et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

How is research evidence used to support claims made in advertisements for wound care products?

(2008) Jo C Dumville et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

(2008) Kerry Dwan et al.   PLoS One

CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration

(2008) Sally Hopewell et al.   PLOS MEDICINE