4.7 Article

Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning

期刊

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 634-640

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0882780]
  2. Applied Environmental Decision Analysis research hub
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0882780] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Review Computer Science, Hardware & Architecture

Toward Model-Driven Sustainability Evaluation

Jorg Kienzle, Gunter Mussbacher, Benoit Combemale, Lucy Bastin, Nelly Bencomo, Jean-Michel Bruel, Christoph Becker, Stefanie Betz, Ruzanna Chitchyan, Betty H. C. Cheng, Sonja Klingert, Richard F. Paige, Birgit Penzenstadler, Norbert Seyff, Eugene Syriani, Colin C. Venters

COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM (2020)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Improving averted loss estimates for better biodiversity outcomes from offset exchanges

Fleur J. F. Maseyk, Martine Maron, Ascelin Gordon, Joseph W. Bull, Megan C. Evans

Summary: Biodiversity offsetting aims to achieve no net loss of biodiversity by compensating for development-induced losses, but the uncertainty and opacity surrounding estimation of benefits poses a major risk.
Article Biodiversity Conservation

We have a steak in it: Eliciting interventions to reduce beef consumption and its impact on biodiversity

Matthew J. Selinske, Fiona Fidler, Ascelin Gordon, Georgia E. Garrard, Alexander M. Kusmanoff, Sarah A. Bekessy

CONSERVATION LETTERS (2020)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Reconciling multiple counterfactuals when evaluating biodiversity conservation impact in social-ecological systems

Joseph W. Bull, Niels Strange, Robert J. Smith, Ascelin Gordon

Summary: When evaluating the impact of biodiversity conservation interventions, the consideration of counterfactuals is essential. Different human actors may have varied assumptions about counterfactuals, leading to divergent perceptions of intervention impacts.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Geospatial User Feedback: How to Raise Users' Voices and Collectively Build Knowledge at the Same Time

Alaitz Zabala, Joan Maso, Lucy Bastin, Gregory Giuliani, Xavier Pons

Summary: This paper proposes an extension of the current Open Geospatial Consortium standard for Geospatial User Feedback to include the required knowledge elements, and a practical implementation. The system can incrementally collect, store, and communicate knowledge elements created by users of the data and keep them linked to the original data by means of permanent data identifiers.

ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION (2021)

Review Ecology

Quantifying the avoided biodiversity impacts associated with economic development

Joseph W. Bull, Laura J. Sonter, Ascelin Gordon, Martine Maron, Divya Narain, April E. Reside, Luis E. Sanchez, Nicole Shumway, Amrei von Hase, Fabien Quetier

Summary: Using the mitigation of biodiversity impacts by development projects as an example, this article explores the challenges of defining and measuring impact avoidance and presents a framework for assessing biodiversity impact avoidance.

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2022)

Article Environmental Studies

Contextual challenges for implementing strategic environmental assessment in the Global South: insights from a case study in Mexico

Marco Gutierrez, Cristina Hernandez-Santin, Sarah A. A. Bekessy, Ascelin Gordon

Summary: An increasing number of countries are implementing strategic environmental assessment (SEA) to support environmentally sustainable development. This study examines Mexico's first attempt at applying SEA to assess the impacts of urban development plans. It identifies key factors to consider for effective implementation of SEA, such as limited knowledge and experience, low trust in public institutions, and limited institutional capacity. Recommendations are provided to address these challenges and can be useful for other countries facing similar difficulties with SEA implementation.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Evaluating the impact of private land conservation with synthetic control design

Roshan Sharma, Simon Jones, Doug Robinson, Ascelin Gordon

Summary: Programs to protect biodiversity on private land are increasingly used worldwide. This study uses synthetic control design, statistical matching, and time-series data to estimate the impact of individual protected areas over time and combines individual-level impacts to estimate program-level impact with a meta-analytic approach. The study provides a transparent and robust workflow to estimate individual and program-level impacts of private protected areas.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2023)

Review Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Credible biodiversity offsetting needs public national registers to confirm no net loss

Heini Kujala, Martine Maron, Christina M. Kennedy, Megan C. Evans, Joseph W. Bull, Brendan A. Wintle, Sayed M. Iftekhar, Katherine E. Selwood, Kahli Beissner, Dave Osborn, Ascelin Gordon

Summary: This article examines the success and challenges of biodiversity offset schemes and highlights the lack of clear and reliable information in existing registers, which hinders the ability to track the no net loss (NNL) of biodiversity. It suggests the need for accessible and credible reporting criteria for public offset registers to bridge the gap between NNL targets and effective tracking systems.

ONE EARTH (2022)

Review Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Flexible conservation decisions for climate adaptation

Jonathan R. Rhodes, Paul R. Armsworth, Gwenllian Iacona, Payal Shah, Ascelin Gordon, Kerrie A. Wilson, Rebecca K. Runting, Brett A. Bryan

Summary: Climate change has significant implications for decision-making in conservation organizations. Uncertainties about climate impacts and adaptation options pose challenges for conservation planning and implementation. To address this, a framework of flexible strategies is proposed to guide strategic choices for climate adaptation in conservation organizations.

ONE EARTH (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Biodiversity offsetting can relocate nature away from people: An empirical case study in Western Australia

Hanna Kalliolevo, Ascelin Gordon, Roshan Sharma, Joseph W. Bull, Sarah A. Bekessy

Summary: This study explores whether relocation of nature is occurring due to development and offsets in Western Australia, finding that offset sites tend to be further away from urban areas than associated development sites, and are located in lower population density areas. While offsets increase publicly accessible land area and improve nature values on public land, it remains unclear whether this relocation of nature is balanced by increased public access to nature.

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2021)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

The Role of Digital Technologies in Responding to the Grand Challenges of the Natural Environment: The Windermere Accord

Gordon S. Blair, Richard Bassett, Lucy Bastin, Lindsay Beevers, Maribel Isabel Borrajo, Mike Brown, Sarah L. Dance, Ada Dionescu, Liz Edwards, Maria Angela Ferrario, Rob Fraser, Harriet Fraser, Simon Gardner, Peter Henrys, Tony Hey, Stuart Homann, Chantal Huijbers, James Hutchison, Phil Jonathan, Rob Lamb, Sophie Laurie, Amber Leeson, David Leslie, Malcolm McMillan, Vatsala Nundloll, Oluwole Oyebamiji, Jordan Phillipson, Vicky Pope, Rachel Prudden, Stefan Reis, Maria Salama, Faiza Samreen, Dino Sejdinovic, Will Simm, Roger Street, Lauren Thornton, Ross Towe, Joshua Vande Hey, Massimo Vieno, Joanne Waller, John Watkins

Summary: Digital technology is making a major impact on the environmental sciences, leading to unprecedented amounts of data being utilized. This new era in environmental science is characterized by breakthroughs in managing complexity and uncertainty, while promoting transparency and reproducibility. Additionally, there is a call for international collaboration in this critical area of research.

PATTERNS (2021)

Review Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Governing for no net loss'' of biodiversity over the long term: challenges and pathways forward

Florence L. P. Damiens, Anna Backstrom, Ascelin Gordon

Summary: Economic development is increasingly affecting biodiversity, leading to the implementation of more biodiversity offset policies globally. However, current offset mechanisms face challenges that require incremental changes to support long-term ecological and social resilience.

ONE EARTH (2021)

Article Environmental Studies

Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: An evaluation of six Australian cases

Marco Gutierrez, Sarah A. Bekessy, Ascelin Gordon

Summary: Research evaluating six Australian SEAs reveals four main findings. Goals to achieve NNL or net gain outcomes for biodiversity lack specification, limiting effectiveness; limited integration of ES considerations restricts potential benefits; offsetting is the most common mitigation measure, suggesting lack of evidence in implementing early steps of the mitigation hierarchy; biodiversity management systems and follow-up activities lack detailed information for judging their usefulness in demonstrating NNL outcomes.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW (2021)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales

Florence L. P. Damiens, Libby Porter, Ascelin Gordon

Summary: A discourse analysis shows that historically biodiversity offsetting has been promoted by reformist approaches encouraging economic growth without consideration of biocultural limits. Recently, proponents of more transformative approaches have reinterpreted offsetting as a tool for transitioning towards sustainable economies respecting planetary boundaries. However, enacting this approach would require major structural governance changes challenging the dominance of reformist coalitions across scales.

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

暂无数据