4.7 Article

Component respiration, ecosystem respiration and net primary production of a mature black spruce forest in northern Quebec

期刊

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 527-540

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpq002

关键词

autotrophic respiration; carbon use efficiency; chamber measurements; CUE; eddy covariance; heterotrophic respiration; NEP; net ecosystem production; soil respiration

类别

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. Fluxnet Canada Research Network (FCRN)
  3. Natural Resources Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measured respiratory fluxes of carbon dioxide by aboveground tree components and soil respiration with chambers in 2005 and scaled up these measurements over space and time to estimate annual ecosystem respiration (R-e) at a mature black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) ecosystem in Quebec, Canada. We estimated periodic annual net primary production (NPP) for this ecosystem also. R-e was estimated at 10.32 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1); heterotrophic respiration (R-h) accounted for 52% of R-e and autotrophic respiration (R-a) accounted for the remainder. We estimated NPP at 3.02 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1), including production of bryophyte biomass but not including shrub NPP. We used these estimates of carbon fluxes to calculate a carbon use efficiency [CUE = NPP/(NPP + R-a)] of 0.38. This estimate of CUE is similar to those reported for other boreal forest ecosystems and it is lower than the value frequently used in global studies. Based on the estimate of R-h being greater than the estimate of NPP, the ecosystem was determined to emit approximately 2.38 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1) to the atmosphere in 2005. Estimates of gross primary production (GPP = NPP + R-a) and R-e differed substantially from estimates of these fluxes derived from eddy covariance measurements during 2005 at this site. The ecological estimates of GPP and R-e were substantially greater than those estimated for eddy covariance measurements. Applying a correction for lack of energy balance closure to eddy covariance estimates reduces differences with ecological estimates. We reviewed possible sources of systematic error in ecological estimates and discuss other possible explanations for these discrepancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据