4.6 Article

Atherosclerosis-Related Circulating MicroRNAs as a Predictor of Stroke Recurrence

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 191-197

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12975-015-0390-1

关键词

MicroRNA; Atherosclerosis; Cerebral infarction; Biomarker; Prognosis

资金

  1. Korea Health technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A111393]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A111393] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short sequenced non-coding RNAs that posttranscriptionally regulate gene expression. We investigated circulating miRNA expression levels in acute stroke patients and its relationship with future vascular event. We included acute ischemic stroke patients who admitted to a university hospital between May 1, 2011, and July 31, 2012, and the patients with vascular risk factors but not incident stroke as controls. We collected 5 ml of venous blood, and circulating miRNA levels were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Five miRNAs (miR-17, miR-21, miR-106a, miR-126, and miR-200b), which had been reported to be related to atherosclerosis, were measured. The levels of miRNAs were compared with the presence of acute stroke, vascular risk factors, stroke subtypes, and stroke recurrence after index stroke. A total of 120 patients were included in the study, with 83 acute stroke patients. The levels of miR-17 were significantly increased in acute stroke patients, and the levels of miR-126 had positive correlation with cerebral atherosclerosis (r = 0.254, p = 0.021). Among the 83 stroke patients, eight experienced stroke recurrence during follow-up and higher level of miR-17 was associated with shorter event-free survival (p = 0.047). This study shows that the miR-17 level was elevated in acute ischemic stroke and associated with future stroke recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据