4.6 Article

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Cocultured With Human Islets Significantly Improves Islet Survival and Function In Vivo

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 801-809

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31828235c7

关键词

Allogeneic bone marrow; Human islets; Diabetes

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [COBRE P20RR018757]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International foundation [1-2007-180]
  3. Roger Williams Hospital Research fund
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A significant barrier to islet transplantation is the rapid loss of human islet function in vivo. The present study evaluates whether bone marrow (BM) could be used to support human islet survival and function in vivo. Methods. We cocultured human islets and BM for 3 weeks before transplantation into the left subrenal capsule of diabetic severe combined immunodeficient mice. Results. The cocultured human islets before transplantation demonstrated improved viability, increased size, and migration capacity in vitro. After 4 months, animals transplanted with precultured BM/islets exhibited euglycemia and detectable human insulin levels (157 mu U/mL), whereas no human insulin was detected in the islet-only transplantation group. Furthermore, the removal of the transplants on day 126 resulted in hyperglycemia, indicating that the reduction of blood glucose was dependent on the transplants. Diabetic mice transplanted with BM/islets demonstrated the longest survival period (130 vs. 40 days for those with islet-only transplants). The transplanted BM/islets showed signs of vascularization and migration from the renal capsule into medulla. Conclusions. Our results suggest that BM precultured with human islets may enhance the survival and function of transplanted islets, thus significantly improving the therapeutic efficacy of islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据