4.6 Article

Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Before Liver Transplantation: Impact on Posttransplant Outcomes

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 92, 期 8, 页码 952-957

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822e6eda

关键词

Acute-on-chronic liver failure; Acute liver decompensation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Acute decompensation in patients with chronic liver disease, resulting from acute kidney injury and infections, leads to significant morbidity and mortality. It is unclear whether patients who develop acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) have poor outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 332 patients to evaluate the effect of ACLF, defined as an acute rise in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of more than 5 within 4 weeks before transplantation, on posttransplant outcomes including stage 4 chronic kidney disease, death, recurrent cirrhosis, or graft failure requiring retransplantation. Results and Conclusions. One hundred fifty-seven patients in the study had ACLF and 175 patients had no ACLF (non-ACLF) pretransplant. Thirty-four patients in the entire cohort received dual organs, 10 of them (29.4%) had ACLF. Seventy-six percent of the patients with ACLF had acute kidney injury as their reason for decompensation and 23.6% had an infection. Mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at transplant was significantly different between the groups (ACLF 28.77 vs. non-ACLF 21.23, P<0.0001). A total of 16.6% of the patients achieved an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min, 21% of patients died, 12.3% developed cirrhosis, and 7.5% received a second transplant. There was no difference in mean eGFR between the ACLF and non-ACLF cohorts at 3 years posttransplant (56.35 mL/min vs. 59.93 mL/min, respectively, P=0.27). On multivariate analysis, ACLF was not significantly associated with eGFR less than 30 mL/min, death, recurrent cirrhosis, or retransplantation when adjusted for potential confounders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据