4.6 Article

Evidence for Induced Expression of HLA Class II on Human Islets: Possible Mechanism for HLA Sensitization in Transplant Recipients

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 87, 期 4, 页码 500-506

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318195fc33

关键词

Islets; HLA sensitization; Transplantation; Inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent reports have shown that islet transplant recipients develop antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II. Because human islets do not express HLA class II under normal conditions, mechanisms underlying induction of the anti-class II response are unclear. We hypothesized that under inflammatory conditions, islets will have induced expression of HLA class II leading to sensitization. Isolated human islets were divided into two groups. Group I was cultured at 37 degrees C as control; group 2 was Cultured similarly in presence of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon gamma. After treatment, islets were analyzed for expression of HLA class II using real-time polymerase chain reaction, immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. Furthermore, serum from an islet transplant recipient who developed anti-class II antibody was tested by flow cytometry for immunoglobulin (Ig) binding to cytokine-stimulated islets. Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis for gene transcripts of class II transactivator, HLA-DR alpha, and HLA-DR beta 1 showed maximum 9.38-, 18.95-, and 46.5-fold increase, respectively in group 2 when compared with control at 24 hr. Cytokine treatment increased HLA class II expression markedly on both a and beta cells in islets as evidenced by fluorescent imaging and flow cytometric analysis. When patient serum was analyzed by flow cytometry, both IgM and IgG binding was observed in cytokine-treated, HLA class II matched islet cells alone. We conclude that inflammation leads to induced expression of HLA class II on transplanted islet cells potentially causing antidonor sensitization and adversely impacting islet transplant outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据