4.6 Article

Requirement of Protocol Biopsy Before and After Complete Cessation of Immunosuppression After Liver Transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 87, 期 4, 页码 606-614

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318195a7cb

关键词

Protocol biopsy; Tolerance; Liver transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Operational tolerance is defined as long-term acceptance of a transplanted organ after complete cessation of immunosuppression (IS), but may not always protect against antigen-dependent changes in graft morphology. Method. IS free patients after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) underwent protocol biopsy (tolerance group [Gr-Tol]) and were evaluated for rejection and fibrosis. The degree of fibrosis was compared with those in the patients on maintenance IS group (Gr-IS) and the base line normal liver group (Gr-BS). When bridging fibrosis or progression of fibrosis was observed, IS was reintroduced or increased in Gr-Tol or in the patients in the weaning process. Results. Neither acute nor chronic rejection was observed. The degree of fibrosis, however, was significantly greater in Gr-Tol than those in Gr-IS and Gr-BS. In Gr-Tol, the number of graft infiltrating FOXP3(+) cells was significantly increased, the interval between LDLT and biopsy plus the donor age was significantly longer, and recipient age at LDLT was significantly younger, compared with those in Gr-IS. However, none of these three parameters correlated with the degree of fibrosis. In 7 of 11 patients in whom IS was reintroduced or increased, the improvement of fibrosis was observed by the subsequent biopsy. Conclusion. Grafts of operationally tolerant patients after LDLT did not exhibit acute or chronic rejection, but they exhibited fibrosis. It remains elusive whether fibrosis observed in tolerant grafts is antigen dependent. The finding that the reintroduction or the increase of IS fibrosis was improved supported the possibility that fibrosis in operationally tolerant after patients was antigen dependent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据