4.2 Article

CD8+ T cells mediate aortic allograft vasculopathy under conditions of calcineurin immunosuppression:: Role of IFN-γ and CTL mediators

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 103-111

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2008.03.003

关键词

allograft vasculopathy; chronic rejection; allograft arteriosclerosis; transplantation; CD8(+) T cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have developed a model of aortic allograft vasculopathy (AV) that uses mouse strains that are fully disparate at Class I, Class II and minor histocompatibility, antigens. Acute rejection is ablated with therapeutic doses of the calcineurin inhibitor Cyclosporine A (CyA). In this way we successfully mimic human disease. Using this model we have demonstrated, with cell transfer models using highly purified T cell populations, that calcineurin inhibitors ablate CD4(+) T cell effector mechanisms. As such, in the presence of calcineurin inhibition, graft vasculopathy is dependent on CD8(+) T cell effector mechanisms. In this study we examine the etiology of graft vasculopathy by these CD8(+) T cells in the presence of calcineurin inhibition. We transfer-red CD8(+) T cells from CyA treated IFN-gamma deficient mice into immunodeficient mouse recipients of aortic allografts to demonstrate that IFN-gamma production by CD8(+) T cells is essential for the development of AV in the presence of calcineurin inhibition. Using two models of CTL ablation we also demonstrated that CTL activity by CD8(+) T cells is essential for the development of AV in the presence of calcineurin inhibition. This is in contrast to models without calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression where either pathway is capable, by itself, of inducing AV. These data indicate that although calcineurin inhibition ablates CD4(+) T cell effects and weakens CD8(+) T cell pathways, the antigenic challenge of the graft is enough to induce sufficient responsiveness from CD8(+) T cells to induce robust AV. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据