4.2 Article

Reduction of Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cell infiltrates during the progression of renal allograft rejection in a mouse model

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 93-102

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2008.03.004

关键词

kidney transplantation; Treg cells; interleukin-6

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Regulatory T (Treg) cells are the immune suppressors in the maintenance of immune homeostasis and tolerance to self and non-self antigens, and may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of transplant rejection in patients. However, Treg cell development and action are poorly understood in transplantation. In this study, the association of CD4(+)Foxp3(+) infiltrates within renal allograft tissue with graft survival was investigated in a mouse model. Methods: Kidney donors from C57BL/6J mice (H-2(b)) were transplanted to bilaterally nephrectomized Balb/c recipient mice (H-2(d)). Treg cells were examined with FACS and immunohistochemical staining. Results: Here we showed that without any immunosuppressive regimen, kidney allografts were mostly rejected from 20 to 60 days after transplantation. During the progression of allograft rejection Foxp3(+) Treg phenotype infiltrates were significantly diminished, while intragraft expression of TGF-beta 1, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-23 was up-regulated. The regulatory function of CD4(+)CD25(+) infiltrates was confirmed by their suppressive activity in mixed lymphocyte reaction. Further in vitro studies indicated that primary renal tubular epithelial cell (TEC) cultures produced high levels of IL-6 in response to allogeneic lymphocyte or IL-17 stimulation, and neutralization of IL-6 increased CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) cells in co-cultures with TEC. Conclusion: Diminution of Foxp3(+) Treg infiltrates associates with renal allograft rejection, and neutralization of IL-6 activity enhances Foxp3(+) Treg cell differentiation. Our findings suggest that increase in intragraft IL-6 may down-regulate infiltrating Foxp3+ Treg cells. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据