4.4 Article

Assessment of protein phosphatase in a re-usable rapid assay format in detecting microcystins and okadaic acid as a precursor to biosensor development

期刊

TOXICON
卷 52, 期 7, 页码 745-753

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.08.010

关键词

Protein phosphatase; Biosensor; Microcystin; Okadaic acid

资金

  1. New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology under the New Economic Research Fund (NERF) [LVL X0205]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Fund in the UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of developing an immobilised protein phosphatase (PP) biosensor was tested by immobilising PP onto CNBr-activated Sepharose beads placed in Millipore microfilter plate wells. Under optimised immobilised enzyme assay conditions, okadaic acid (OA) and microcystin LR (MC-LR) inhibited Upstate Biotechnology PP (PP-2A), with IC50 values of 12.5 and 11 nM respectively. Similarly, immobilised recombinant PP type 1 (rec PP-1) was inhibited by MC-LR and OA, with IC50 values of 150 and > 1000 nM respectively. The IC50 values for free PP-2A against OA and MC-LR were 2.5 and 3.5 nM, and 0.7 nM and 200 nM for rec PP-1 against the same substrates respectively. For free and immobilised Neptunea arthritic PP (PP-2A(na)) against OA the IC50 values were 0.45 and > 1000 nM respectively. Of the three immobilised enzyme systems, PP-2A showed greatest sensitivity to OA and MC-LR followed by rec PP-1 and PP-2A(na). In assessments for reusability (determined by removal of >= 70% CA or MC-LR inhibition of PP-2A by washing), < 50% of the original activity remained after 20 washings. Including 1 M NaCl in the wash buffer did not increase enzyme activity with wash frequency, but rather salted in the inhibitor. The LoD of immobilised PP-2A to MC-LR meets the WHO guideline of 1 mu g l(-1) for drinking water, and the sensitivity to OA (3.5 mu g l(-1)) would allow detection of DSP during the peak of some phytoplankton blooms. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据