4.4 Article

Examination of transformation among tetrodotoxin and its analogs in the living cultured juvenile puffer fish, kusafugu, Fugu niphobles by intramuscular administration

期刊

TOXICON
卷 52, 期 6, 页码 714-720

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.08.002

关键词

Tetrodotoxin; Puffer fish; Kusafugu; Fugu niphobles; Transformation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan [16380138, 18032014]
  2. JSPS [19580119]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19580119, 16380138, 18032014] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In puffer fish, tetrodotoxin (TTX) exists as the major toxin with chemically equilibrium analogs (4-epiTTX, 4,9-anhydroTTX) and chemically non-equilibrium analogs (deoxy analogs, 11-oxoTTX, 4-S-cysteinylTTX). There are two purposes to this study: 1) to search for the reason why TTX is the most major analog in puffer fish, even 4,9-anhydroTTX is chemically more stable, 2) to investigate whether or not chemically non-equilibrium analogs are transformed in puffer fish, because these were predicted to be biosynthetic intermediates. Pure TTX, 4-epiTTX, 4,9-anhydroTTX, and 11-oxoTTX were separately administrated to the cultured non-toxic juvenile puffer fish kusafugu, Fugu niphobles by intramuscular injection. Sixteen days after administration, TTX analogs in the whole fish were analyzed by LC-fluorescent detection and LC/MS. By the administration of TTX, 4epiTTX, and 4,9-anhydroTTX, 34-40% of the administrated doses of the toxins were accumulated, and 4,9-anhydroTTX has become the major toxin after inter-conversion. This result indicates discrepancy from the previous ones wherein TTX was predominantly accumulated when TTXs were administrated through diets; this suggests that dietary administration might be necessary to accumulate TTX as the major toxin, and not 4,9-anhydroTTX. Transformations from TTX to deoxy analogs or 11-oxbTTX, or from 11-oxoTTX to TTX were not detected in this study. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据