4.5 Article

Dioscin, a natural steroid saponin, shows remarkable protective effect against acetaminophen-induced liver damage in vitro and in vivo

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 214, 期 1, 页码 69-80

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.08.005

关键词

Acetaminophen; Dioscin; Hepatotoxicity; Liver damage; Mitochondrial

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-1007]
  2. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [2009R15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to investigate the protective effect of dioscin against APAP-induced hepatotoxicity. In the in vitro tests, HepG2 cells were given APAP pretreatment with or without dioscin. In the in vivo experiments, mice were orally administrated dioscin for five days and then given APAP. Some biochemical and morphology parameters were assayed and the possible mechanism was investigated. Dioscin improved AST release, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis and necrosis of HepG2 cells induced by APAP. Following administration of dioscin, APAP-induced hepatotoxicity in mice was significantly attenuated. Furthermore, the liver cell apoptosis and necrosis, and hepatic mitochondrial edema were also prevented. Fifteen differentially expressed proteins were found by using proteomics, and six of them, Suox, Krt18, Rgn, Prdx1, MDH and PNP were validated. These proteins may be involved in the hepatoprotective effect of dioscin and might cooperate with the levels of Ca2+ in mitochondria, decreased expression of ATP2A2, and decreased mitochondrial cardiolipin. In addition, dioscin inhibited APAP-induced activation and expression of CYP2E1, up-regulated the expression of Bcl-2 and Bid, and inhibited the expression of Bax, Bak and p53. Dioscin showed a remarkable protective effect against APAP-induced hepatotoxicity by adjusting mitochondrial function. These results indicated that dioscin has the capability on the treatment of liver injury. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据