4.5 Article

Differential toxic effects of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and 6-thioguanine on human hepatocytes

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 632-642

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.12.004

关键词

human; hepatocytes; HepaRG; hepatoma cells; metabolism; toxicity; thiopurine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thiopurines (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and 6-thioguanine) are therapeutic compounds widely administered in the clinic for their multiple uses (autoirnmune diseases, post-transplant immunosuppression and cancer). Despite these advantages, their therapeutic potential is limited by occasional adverse effects (myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity) and by a relatively frequent lack of efficacy. Previous studies have demonstrated that azathioprine decreased the viability of rat hepatocytes. In order to investigate cytotoxic effects of thiopurines in human liver, we used primary human hepatocytes and a highly differentiated human hepatoma cell line, HepaRG, treated or not with azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and 6-thioguanine. In parallel, expression of the genes involved in the metabolism of thiopurines, glutathione synthesis and antioxidant defences was measured by quantitative PCR. We clearly demonstrate that human liver parenchymal cells were much less sensitive than rat hepatocytes to thiopurine treatments. The toxic effects appeared after 96 h of treatment while ATP depletion was observed after a 24 h incubation with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. Toxic effects were more pronounced for azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, when compared to 6-thioguanine, and might explain glutathione synthesis and antioxidant enzyme induction only by these two drugs. Finally, we also demonstrate for the first time an up-regulation by azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase which might have consequences on the de novo biosynthesis of guanine nucleotides and thiopurines metabolism. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据