4.6 Article

Uncoupling nicotine mediated motoneuron axonal pathfinding errors and muscle degeneration in zebrafish

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 237, 期 1, 页码 29-40

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.06.025

关键词

Motoneuron; Axonal pathfinding; Muscle degeneration; Sofa potato

资金

  1. Louisiana Board of Regents [LEQSF(2005-08)-RD-A-11]
  2. NIH/National institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES016513, P30-ES00210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zebrafish embryos offer a unique opportunity to investigate the mechanisms by which nicotine exposure impacts early vertebrate development. Embryos exposed to nicotine become functionally paralyzed by 42 hpf suggesting that the neuromuscular system is compromised in exposed embryos. We previously demonstrated that secondary spinal motoneurons in nicotine-exposed embryos were delayed in development and that their axons made pathfinding errors (Svoboda, K.R., Vijayaraghaven, S., Tanguay, R.L., 2002. Nicotinic receptors mediate changes in spinal motoneuron development and axonal pathfinding ill embryonic zebrafish exposed to nicotine. J. Neurosci. 22, 10731-10741). In that Study, we did not consider the potential role that altered skeletal muscle development caused by nicotine exposure could play in contributing to the errors in spinal motoneuron axon pathfinding. In this Study, we show that an alteration in skeletal muscle development occurs in tandem with alterations in spinal motoneuron development upon exposure to nicotine. The alteration in the Muscle involves the binding of nicotine to the muscle-specific AChRs. The nicotine-induced alteration in muscle development does not Occur in the zebrafish mutant (sofa potato, [sop]), which lacks muscle-specific AChRs. Even though muscle development is unaffected by nicotine exposure in sop mutants, motoneuron axonal pathfinding errors still occur in these mutants, indicating a direct effect of nicotine exposure on nervous system development. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据