4.7 Article

Functional inactivation of triosephosphate isomerase through phosphorylation during etoposide-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells: Potential role of Cdk2

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 278, 期 2, 页码 224-228

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.02.005

关键词

Cdk2; Apoptosis; Triosephosphate isomerase; Phosphorylation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Up-regulation of cyclin-dependent protein kinase 2 (Cdk2) activity has been suggested to be prerequisite for progression of apoptosis induced by various apoptotic stimuli. In this study, we applied a phosphoproteomic technique to screen target molecules of Cdk2 during etoposide-induced apoptosis. For this purpose, phosphoproteins from the cell lysates were enriched by using Fe3+-IMAC column chromatography and resolved on a high resolution 2D PAGE gel. We identified six phosphoproteins by the use of MALDI-TOF technique. The cellular levels of these phosphoproteins were markedly reduced in the presence of etoposide in HeLa cells transfected with dominant negative mutant construct of Cdk2. Among the six candidate phosphoproteins, human triosephosphate isomerase (TPI), a glycolytic enzyme, was found to be a direct substrate of Cdk2 during etoposide-induced apoptosis. In an in vitro phosphorylation assay, TPI purified by use of a baculoviral expression system was phosphorylated by recombinant Cyclin A/Cdk2 kinase. This led to reduced enzyme activity for the conversion of glucose aldehyde-3-phosphate to dihydroxyacetone phosphate. Such phosphorylation of TPI and a subsequent decrease in its enzyme activity were prevented by treatment with olomoucine, a specific inhibitor of Cdk2. The above findings, taken together, suggest TPI as a potential target protein of Cyclin A/Cdk2. Loss of catalytic activity of TPI as a consequence of phosphorylation of this glycolytic enzyme may disrupt energy production in etoposide-treated HeLa cells, rendering these cells prone to undergo apoptosis. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据