4.2 Article

Two Principal Components, Coping and Independence, Comprise Patient Enablement in Japan: Cross Sectional Study in Tohoku Area

期刊

TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 227, 期 2, 页码 97-104

出版社

TOHOKU UNIV MEDICAL PRESS
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.227.97

关键词

enablement; medical consultations; patient satisfaction; physician-patient relations; questionnaires

资金

  1. Jikei University School of Medicine
  2. Postgraduate Medical School research grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept of patient enablement involves patients' perceptions of ability to understand and cope with illness. Improving enablement is an important goal of medical consultations for patients with chronic illness. To measure enablement, a post-medical-consultation patient-reported questionnaire was developed and named Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) in the United Kingdom. Unfortunately, there has been no tool to evaluate patient enablement in Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to develop PEI Japanese version, to examine its validity and reliability, and to clarify the constitution of concept about patient enablement among Japanese patients. The translation process included forward translation, expert panel back-translation, following the standard WHO process. Participants were 256 individuals (157 men and 99 women; mean age 62.9 +/- 11.8 years) receiving a regular outpatient treatment due to chronic illness at the Department of Cardiology, Respiratory, or Endocrinology and Metabolism in a regional hospital. To assess validity, we compared PEI with Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) by correlation coefficient, which was 0.55 (P < 0.01). Furthermore, factor analysis indicated that PEI had two principal factors labeled coping with illness and health maintenance and confidence in oneself and independence. For an evaluation of reliability, internal consistency was calculated (Cronbach's alpha = 0.875). In conclusion, two principal factors comprise patient enablement measured by PEI with satisfactory validity and reliability. PEI Japanese version will be a useful tool to evaluate and improve medical consultations in Japan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据