4.2 Article

Cardiac Diastolic Dysfunction Is Associated with Cerebral White Matter Lesions in Elderly Patients with Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis

期刊

TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 216, 期 2, 页码 99-108

出版社

TOHOKU UNIV MEDICAL PRESS
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.216.99

关键词

Cardiac diastolic function; cerebral white matter lesions; echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered to be the result of brain ischemic injury and a risk factor for clinical stroke. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between the cardiac diastolic function and cerebral white matter lesions in elderly patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis. The study subjects were 55 patients (75 7 years) with risk factors for atherosclerosis including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular events were excluded from the study. Cerebral white matter lesions, which were defined as exhibiting high intensity regions on brain MRI, were evaluated with the degrees of periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) according to the Japanese Brain Dock Guidelines of 2003. Peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E' velocity) was measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography, and was used as a parameter of cardiac diastolic function. The mean value of E' velocity was decreased due to the cardiac diastolic dysfunction (5.2 +/- 1.4 cm/s). In addition, the E' velocity was inversely correlated with the degree of PVH (rho = -0.701, p < 0.001). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the decrease in the E' veiocity (beta coefficient = -0.42, p < 0.001) and the presence of hypertension (beta coefficient = 0.3 1, p = 0.001) were independent determinants of the degree of PVH. Thus, cardiac diastolic dysfunction is correlated to the severity of cerebral white matter lesions, suggesting the cardio-cerebral connection in elderly patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据