4.5 Article

Reported awareness of tobacco advertising and promotion in China compared to Thailand, Australia and the USA

期刊

TOBACCO CONTROL
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 222-227

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.027037

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Cancer Institute [P50 CA111236, R01 CA100362]
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [045734]
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [57897, 79551]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [265903, 450110]
  5. Cancer Research UK [C312/A3726]
  6. Canadian Tobacco Control Research Initiative [014578]
  7. Center for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation
  8. National Cancer Institute of Canada/Canadian Cancer Society
  9. Thai Health Promotion Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: China currently does not have comprehensive laws or regulations on tobacco advertising and promotion, although it ratified the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in October 2005 and promised to ban all tobacco advertising by January 2011. Much effort is needed to monitor the current situation of tobacco advertising and promotion in China. Objective: This study aims to examine levels of awareness of tobacco advertising and promotion among smokers in China as compared to other countries with different levels of restrictions. Methods: One developing country (Thailand) and two developed countries (Australia and the USA) were selected for comparison. All four countries are part of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Survey project. Between 2005 and 2006, parallel ITC surveys were conducted among adult smokers (at least smoked weekly) in China (n=4763), Thailand (n=2000), Australia (n=1767) and the USA (n=1780). Unprompted and prompted recall of noticing tobacco advertising and promotion were measured. Results: Chinese respondents reported noticing tobacco advertisements in a range of channels and venues, with highest exposure levels on television (34.5%), billboards (33.4%) and in stores (29.2%). A quarter of respondents noticed tobacco sponsorships, and a high level of awareness of promotion was reported. Cross-country comparison reveals that overall reported awareness was significantly higher in China than in Thailand (particularly) and Australia, but lower than in the USA. Conclusions: There is a big gap between China and the better-performing countries such as Thailand and Australia regarding tobacco promotion restrictions. China needs to do more, including enhanced policy and more robust enforcement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据