4.4 Article

Polyelectrolyte Multilayers in Tissue Engineering

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART B-REVIEWS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 101-113

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0548

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-090750]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIDDK-1R21DK077802]
  3. Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Sciences
  4. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [0907590] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The layer-by-layer assembly of sequentially adsorbed, alternating polyelectrolytes has become increasingly important over the past two decades. The ease and versatility in assembling polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs) has resulted in numerous wide ranging applications of these materials. More recently, PEMs are being used in biological applications ranging from biomaterials, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and drug delivery. The ability to manipulate the chemical, physical, surface, and topographical properties of these multilayer architectures by simply changing the pH, ionic strength, thickness, and postassembly modifications render them highly suitable to probe the effects of external stimuli on cellular responsiveness. In the field of regenerative medicine, the ability to sequester growth factors and to tether peptides to PEMs has been exploited to direct the lineage of progenitor cells and to subsequently maintain a desired phenotype. Additional novel applications include the use of PEMs in the assembly of three-dimensional layered architectures and as coatings for individual cells to deliver tunable payloads of drugs or bioactive molecules. This review focuses on literature related to the modulation of chemical and physical properties of PEMs for tissue engineering applications and recent research efforts in maintaining and directing cellular phenotype in stem cell differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据