4.2 Article

The Impact of Substrate Stiffness and Mechanical Loading on Fibroblast-Induced Scaffold Remodeling

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
卷 18, 期 17-18, 页码 1804-1817

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0514

关键词

-

资金

  1. Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT)
  2. Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies (BSRT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibroblasts as many other cells are known to form, contract, and remodel the extracellular matrix (ECM). The presented study aims to gain an insight into how mechanical boundary conditions affect the production of ECM components, their remodeling, and the feedback of the altered mechanical cell environment on these processes. The influence of cyclic mechanical loading (f = 1 Hz, 10% axial compression) and scaffold stiffness (E = 1.2 and 8.5 kPa) on the mechanical properties of fibroblast-seeded scaffold constructs were investigated in an in vitro approach over 14 days of culture. To do so, a newly developed bioreactor system was employed. While mechanical loading resulted in a clear upregulation of procollagen-I and fibronectin production, scaffold stiffness showed to primarily influence matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) secretion and cell-induced scaffold contraction. Higher stiffness of the collagen scaffolds resulted in an up to twofold higher production of collagen-degrading MMP-1. The changes of mechanical parameters like Young's modulus, maximum compression force, and elastic portion of compression force over time suggest that from initially distinct mechanical starting conditions (scaffold stiffness), the construct's mechanical properties converge over time. As a consequence of mechanical loading a shift toward higher construct stiffness was observed. The results suggest that scaffold stiffness has only a temporary effect on cell behavior, while the impact of mechanical loading is preserved over time. Thus, it is concluded that the mechanical environment of the cell after remodeling is depending on mechanical loading rather than on initial scaffold stiffness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据