4.2 Article

Expansion and Redifferentiation of Chondrocytes from Osteoarthritic Cartilage: Cells for Human Cartilage Tissue Engineering

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 3513-3523

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0628

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Football League Charities
  2. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine if selected culture conditions enhance the expansion and redifferentiation of chondrocytes isolated from human osteoarthritic cartilage with yields appropriate for creation of constructs for treatment of joint-scale cartilage defects, damage, or osteoarthritis. Methods: Chondrocytes isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage were analyzed to determine the effects of medium supplement on cell expansion in monolayer and then cell redifferentiation in alginate beads. Expansion was assessed as cell number estimated from DNA, growth rate, and day of maximal growth. Redifferentiation was evaluated quantitatively from proteoglycan and collagen type II content, and qualitatively by histology and immunohistochemistry. Results: Using either serum or a growth factor cocktail (TFP: transforming growth factor beta 1, fibroblast growth factor 2, and platelet-derived growth factor type bb), cell growth rate in monolayer was increased to 5.5x that of corresponding conditions without TFP, and cell number increased 100-fold within 17 days. In subsequent alginate bead culture with human serum or transforming growth factor b1 and insulin-transferrin-selenium-linoleic acid-bovine serum albumin, redifferentiation was enhanced with increased proteoglycan and collagen type II production. Effects of human serum were dose dependent, and 5% or higher induced formation of chondron-like structures with abundant proteoglycan-rich matrix. Conclusion: Chondrocytes from osteoarthritic cartilage can be stimulated to undergo 100-fold expansion and then redifferentiation, suggesting that they may be useful as a cell source for joint-scale cartilage tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据