4.6 Article

Non-therapeutic anti-Xa levels in medical patients receiving anticoagulant therapy with enoxaparin

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 132, 期 4, 页码 433-436

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.017

关键词

Drug monitoring; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa; Low-molecular-weight heparin

资金

  1. Vicerrectoria de Investigacion, Universidad de Costa Rica

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin is not routinely monitored even when previous studies have shown a high pharmacological variability. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of non-therapeutic anti-Xa levels among medical patients using enoxaparin as anticoagulant therapy and to point out potential risk factors related to the risk of having a sub-therapeutic level. Materials and methods: Anti-Xa levels were measured in a cohort of sixty patients with medical indication for enoxaparin. Patients were categorized according to anti-Xa levels as follows: suboptimal anticoagulation (<0.5 IU/ml), optimal anticoagulation (between 0.5 and 1.2 IU/ml) or overanticoagulated (>1.2 IU/ml). Demographic and clinical variables and the use of concomitant medications were described for each group. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the relationship between sub-optimal anticoagulation and potential predictive variables. A linear regression analysis was done to assess the relationship between anti-Xa activity, age, weight, body mass index, administered dose/weight and creatinine clearance. Results: The mean anti-Xa activity was 0.71 +/- 0.32 UI/ml. Thirty one percent of patients had anti-Xa levels out of the therapeutic range, most of them (twenty-eight percent of total population) with a sub-therapeutic level. None of the variables were associated with the risk of a sub-therapeutic anti-Xa level. Conclusion: Almost one third of patients receiving enoxaparin had anti-Xa levels out of the therapeutic range. We need more studies to determine the clinical relevance of these findings. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据