4.6 Article

Heavy chain myosin 9-related disease (MYH9-RD): Neutrophil inclusions of myosin-9 as a pathognomonic sign of the disorder

期刊

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 826-832

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1160/TH09-08-0593

关键词

MYH9-related diseases; thrombocytopenia; giant platelets; MYH9 gene; neutrophil inclusions

资金

  1. Telethon Foundation [GGP06177]
  2. Italian Institute of Health
  3. IRCCS Burlo Garofolo [34/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MYH9-related disease (MYH9-RD) is an autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia with giant platelets variably associated with young-adult onset of progressive sensorineural hearing loss, presenile cataract, and renal damage. MYH9-RD is caused by mutations of MYH9, the gene encoding for non-muscle heavy-chain myosin-9. Wild-type and mutant myosin-9 aggregate as cytoplasmic inclusions in patients' leukocytes, the identification of which by immunofluorescence has been proposed as a suitable tool for the diagnosis of MYH9-RD. Since the predictive value of this assay, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, is unknown, we investigated 118 consecutive unrelated patients with a clinical presentation strongly consistent with MYH9-RD. All patients prospectively underwent both the immunofluorescence assay for myosin-9 aggregate detection and molecular genetic analysis of the MYH9 gene. Myosin-9 aggregates were identified in 82 patients, 80 of which (98%) had also a MYH9 mutation. In the remaining 36 patients neither myosin-9 aggregates nor MYH9 mutations were found. Sensitivity and specificity of the immunofluorescence assay was evaluated to be 100% and 95%, respectively. Except for the presence of aggregates, we did not find any other significant difference between patients with or without aggregates, demonstrating that the myosin-9 inclusions in neutrophils are a pathognomonic sign of the disease. However, the identification of the specific MYH9 mutation is still of importance for prognostic aspects of MYH9-RD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据