4.6 Article

Relationship of sperm small heat-shock protein 10 and voltage-dependent anion channel 2 with semen freezability in boars

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 418-426

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.023

关键词

Boar sperm; Cryopreservation; Freezability marker; ODF1/HSPB10; VDAC2

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RZ 2011-00001-00-00]
  2. University of Girona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Freezability differences between boar ejaculates exist, but there is no useful method to predict the ejaculate freezability before sperm cryopreservation takes place. In this context, the present study sought to determine whether the amounts of small heat-shock protein 10 (also known as outer dense fiber protein 1) (ODF1/HSPB10) and voltage-dependent anion channel 2 (VDAC2) may be used as boar sperm freezability markers. With this aim, 26 boar ejaculates were split into two fractions: one for protein extraction and the other for cryopreservation purposes. Ejaculates were subsequently classified into two groups (good freezability ejaculates [GFE] and poor freezability ejaculates [PFE]) based on viability and sperm motility assessments after 30 and 240 minutes of after thawing. Although the VDAC2 amounts, analyzed through Western blot, were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in GFE (1.15 +/- 0.18 density mm(2)) than in PFE (0.16 +/- 0.03 density mm(2)), no significant differences were observed in ODF1/HSPB10 between both groups (i.e., 1.97 +/- 0.38 density mm(2) in GFE vs. 1.87 +/- 1.54 density mm(2) in PFE). In addition, principal component and multiple regression analyses indicated that the component explaining most of the variance (78.41%) in ejaculate freezability at 240 minutes after thawing resulted to be significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with VDAC2 content. This result revealed that the amounts of VDAC2 but not those of ODF1/HSPB10 may be used to predict the freezability of a given boar ejaculate before starting cryopreservation procedures. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据