4.7 Article

Black carbon radiative forcing over the Indian Arctic station, Himadri during the Arctic Summer of 2012

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 29-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.013

关键词

Black carbon; Arctic Summer; Himadri; Temporal variations; Long range transport; Radiative forcing

资金

  1. Indian Space Research Organisation-Geosphere Biosphere Program, Department of Space, Government of India
  2. National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, Ministry of Earth Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The warming of Arctic region has recently gained worldwide attention due to its projected impacts on global climate system. The effect of anthropogenic black carbon (BC) aerosol on snow is of enduring interest due to its role in aerosol radiative forcing and further consequences for Arctic and global climate change. Using an A ethalometer, measurements of BC aerosols were continuously carried out over the Indian Arctic Station, Himadri during the Arctic Summer (23 July to 19 August) of 2012. Monthly mean BC mass concentration during July and August was found to be 0.093 +/- 0.046 and 0.069 +/- 0.050 mu g/m(3), respectively. BC mass concentration showed maximum loading during 0800-1600 LT. Transport from distant sources (as observed from air mass back trajectories) apart from some local anthropogenic activities (emissions from shipping and power plant) could be the possible sources for observed BC concentration at Himadri. Using the OPAC and SBDART models, optical properties and aerosol radiative forcing (ARF) in the spectral range 0.2 to 4 mu m for composite aerosol and without-BC aerosol at the top of the atmosphere, surface and atmosphere were computed. The presence of BC resulted in positive radiative forcing in the atmosphere leading to warming effect (+2.1 W/m(2)) whereas cooling was observed at the top of the atmosphere (-0.4 W/m(2)) and at surface (-2.5 W/m(2)). BC formed about 57% of atmospheric ARF. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据