4.5 Article

Regression of liver metastases after treatment with intraperitoneal catumaxomab for malignant ascites due to breast cancer

期刊

TARGETED ONCOLOGY
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 291-294

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11523-012-0240-y

关键词

Catumaxomab; Intraperitoneal; Locoregional effects; Systemic effects; EpCAM; Breast cancer; Malignant ascites; Liver metastases

类别

资金

  1. Fresenius Biotech GmbH, Munich, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant ascites is quite rare in breast cancer and is mainly associated with a lobular histology. To date, no studies have evaluated locoregional therapy for malignant ascites in breast cancer. The anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), trifunctional antibody catumaxomab was approved in the European Union for the intraperitoneal (i.p.) treatment of malignant ascites in patients with EpCAM-positive carcinomas where standard therapy is not available or no longer feasible. We report the case of a 69-year-old female with pretreated breast cancer who received i.p. catumaxomab for the treatment of malignant ascites and showed a regression of liver metastases. The patient originally underwent a left mastectomy and ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection for an invasive ductal carcinoma in 1995. Following several lines of treatment, she was enrolled in February 2010 in a phase IIIb study (CASIMAS) investigating the safety of a 3-h i.p. catumaxomab infusion. In addition to a local benefit, as shown by an improvement in malignant ascites and a prolongation of the paracentesis-free interval with i.p. catumaxomab, a computed tomography scan, performed some weeks after catumaxomab administration, showed a regression of liver metastases. In addition to a locoregional effect on EpCAM-positive disease, i.p. catumaxomab may also show systemic effects. The use of i.p. catumaxomab for the treatment of malignant ascites due to breast cancer should be explored further in appropriate clinical studies and its possible systemic effects should also be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据