4.7 Article

Chemometric-assisted MIP-optosensing system for the simultaneous determination of monoamine naphthalenes in drinking waters

期刊

TALANTA
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 57-65

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.10.045

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs); Optosensors; Chemometric multivariate calibration; Monoamine naphthalene compounds

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education [AP2006-01147, CrQ2007-60079]
  2. Regional Government of Andalusia [RNM-666, P07-FQM-02625]
  3. The National University of Rosario
  4. CONICET (Nacional Centre of Scientific and Tecnical Research)
  5. ANPCyT (Nacional Agency of Scientific and Tecnical Promotion)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work a chemometric-assisted molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-fluorescence optosensing system has been developed for determining monoamines naphthalene compounds in drinking waters. The use of chemometrics for processing flow injection analysis with MIP fluorescence optosensor data allowed the simultaneous determination of the principal monoamine naphthalene compounds 1-naphthylamine (1-NA) and 2-naphthylamine (2-NA) even in presence of potential interferent 1-naphthalenemethylamine (1-NMA). Classical chemometrics tools such as partial least-squares (PLS-1), as well as second-order algorithms like multiway PLS (N-PLS) and unfolded PLS (U-PLS), were successfully applied, assisting fluorescence emission spectra at a fixed excitation wavelength or excitation-emission fluorescence matrices (EEM), respectively, when interferents are considered in the calibration set. The combinations of both N-PLS and U-PLS with residual bilinearization (RBL), achieving the second-order advantage, were satisfactory applied for the simultaneous determination of the main monoamine naphthalene compounds in drinking water, in the presence of a potential interferent without sample pretreatment, even when the later is not modeled in calibration set. Predictive ability, accuracy, figures of merit, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the different strategies were discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据