4.7 Article

Characterization of airborne ice-nucleation-active bacteria and bacterial fragments

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 105-117

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.060

关键词

INA bacteria; Ice nucleation; Airborne bacteria; Aeromicrobiology; Bioprecipitation; Outer membrane vesicles

资金

  1. Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation (Forsknings-og Innovationsstyrelsen)
  2. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF106]
  3. ASTERISK project (ASTERoseismic Investigations with SONG and Kepler) - European Research Council [267864]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some bacteria have the unique capacity of synthesising ice-nucleation-active (INA) proteins and exposing them at their outer membrane surface. As INA bacteria enter the atmosphere, they may impact the formation of clouds and precipitation. We studied members of airborne bacterial communities for their capacity to catalyse ice formation and we report on the excretion of INA proteins by airborne Pseudomonas sp. We also observed for the first time that INA biological fragments <220 nm were present in precipitation samples (199 and 482 INA fragments per L of precipitation), which confirms the presence of submicron INA biological fragments in the atmosphere. During 14 precipitation events, strains affiliated with the genus Pseudomonas, which are known to carry ina genes, were dominant. A screening for INA properties revealed that similar to 12% of the cultivable bacteria caused ice formation at <=-7 degrees C. They had likely been emitted to the atmosphere from terrestrial surfaces, e.g. by convective transport. We tested the ability of isolated INA strains to produce outer membrane vesicles and found that two isolates could do so. However, only very few INA vesicles were released per INA cell. Thus, the source of the submicron INA proteinaceous particles that we detected in the atmosphere remains to be elucidated. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据