4.0 Article

Production of indole-3-acetic acid by Thai native orchid-associated fungi

期刊

SYMBIOSIS
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 35-44

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13199-012-0158-2

关键词

Endophytic fungi; Indole-3-acetic acid; L-tryptophan; Orchids

资金

  1. Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand
  2. National Research University
  3. Graduate School of Chiang Mai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thirteen endophytic fungi were isolated from roots of three orchid species, Spathoglottis affinis, Paphiopedelum bellatulum and Phaius tankervilleae. Of these, three fungal isolates produced high levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in culture medium supplemented with 2 mg/ml of L-tryptophan, and were selected for further analysis. Morphological characteristics and a phylogenetic analysis based on an alignment of internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear rDNA indicated that the fungal isolates CMU-SLP 007 and CMU-NUT 013 belonged to family Tulasnellaceae, genus Tulasnella (the anamorphic genus Epulorhiza) and the fungal isolate CMU-AU 006 belonged to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. These three fungal isolates produced maximum levels of IAA when grown in a culture medium supplemented with 4 mg/ml of L-tryptophan (C. gloeosporioides CMU-AU 006, 243.56 mu g/ml and Tulasnella sp. CMU-SLP 007, 155.63 mu g/ml) and 6 mg/ml of L-tryptophan (Tulasnella sp. CMU-NUT 013, 104.03 mu g/ml). Thin layer chromatography revealed that all fungal IAA presented the same R-f value as the standard IAA. The biological activity of fungal IAA showed that it increased the length of stem forming roots and the number of roots of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), promoted seed germination, the length of roots and root to shoot ratio of corn (Zea mays) and increased the elongation of rice (Oryza sativa) coleoptiles when compared with all controls (water and culture medium treatments). In addition, the results of all biological activities using fungal IAA indicated that the quality of fungal IAA were similar to standard IAA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据