4.6 Article

Neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO)

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3711-7

关键词

Cholecystectomy; Surgical conditions; Anaesthesia; Neuromuscular blocking agents; Postoperative pain; Pulmonary function

类别

资金

  1. MSD Sharpe Dohme
  2. Essex
  3. Baxter
  4. Care Fusion
  5. GE Healthcare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the impact of muscle relaxation on surgical conditions and patients' postoperative outcome during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced anaesthesia. After approval and consent, 57 anaesthetized patients were randomly assigned to group no neuromuscular blockade (No NMB) and deep neuromuscular blockade (Deep NMB), i.e. no twitch response to train-of-four nerve stimulation. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed using the 4-trocar technique with a CO2-pneumoperitoneum. Surgical conditions were assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale. Movement of diaphragm or abdominal muscles, inadequate visibility, or breathing and coughing against the ventilator were documented as events reflecting inadequate muscle relaxation. Independently, surgeons could request 0.3 mg/kg rocuronium to improve surgical conditions. Workflow variables were obtained as a surrogate of surgical conditions. Data are presented as mean (95 % confidence interval). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00895778). While in 12 of 25 patients of group No NMB one or more adverse events impaired the surgical procedure (p < 0.001), only 1 of 25 patients of group Deep NMB showed an adverse event. Deep NMB resulted in an absolute risk reduction of 0.44 (0.23-0.65) and a number needed to treat of 2.3 (1.5-4.4), respectively. Surgeons requested 0.3 mg/kg rocuronium in 10 of 25 cases (40 %) of group No NMB only. This dose significantly improved surgical conditions by an average 62 of 100 possible points. All further variables did not differ between groups. Deep NMB ameliorates surgical conditions for laparoscopic cholecystectomy by improved visibility and reduction of involuntary movements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据