4.6 Article

Blockage of CXCR2 suppresses tumor growth of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma

期刊

SURGERY
卷 155, 期 4, 页码 640-649

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.037

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21591765]
  2. Ministry of Health
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591765, 24592015] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims. Complete operative resection is the only approach to cure for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC), but the disease's prognosis is notably poor. A novel therapeutic approach is urgently required. CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) has been associated with tumorigenesis and metastasis in human cancers. In this study, we investigated the suppressive effect of ICC growth by blocking CXCR2. Material and methods. The role of CXCR2 was estimated using the human ICC cell lines, RBE and SSP25. CXCR2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) and an antagonist (SB225002) were used to block CXCR2. Proliferation assays, migration assays, and invasion assays were performed to confirm the suppressive effect of blocking CXCR2. Subcutaneous SSP25 tumors were established in athymic nude mice, and the mice were given SB225002. The expression of CXCR2 in ICC was determined by immunohistochemical staining of 34 ICC specimens. We investigated the relationship between CXCR2 expression and prognosis in ICC. Results. The prognosis of patients who had higher CXCR2 expression in ICC was significantly poor (P = .004). CXCR2 siRNA treatment significantly suppressed CXCR2 expression in both RBE and SSP25. Cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were significantly suppressed by both CXCR2 siRNA and SB225002 compared with the control group. SB225002 also suppressed the growth of transplanted subcutaneous tumors (P = .02) Conclusion. Our results demonstrated that blocking CXCR2 clearly suppressed the development of ICC. Blocking CXCR2 may be a promising therapeutic approach for ICC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据