4.6 Article

Lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion diminishes prognosis in esophageal cancer

期刊

SURGERY
卷 153, 期 4, 页码 526-534

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.10.007

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-associated lymphatic networks are the primary routes for tumor cell dissemination and metastasis. Behind the background of possible lymphangiogenesis-associated therapies, the clinical impact of lymphangiogenesis (measured by lymphatic microvessel density [LMVD]) and specific lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in esophageal cancer remains unclear The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical role of lymphangiogenesis and LVI in a large cohort of esophageal cancer. Methods. For the specific assessment of LMVD and LVI, 393 tissue samples from a prospective tissue databank of esophageal adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, and their precursor lesions were included into this study. LMVD and LVI were assessed by immunostaining for podoplanin, a selective marker of lymphatic endothelium. In addition the peritumoral inflammatory stroma reaction (ISR) was assessed. Results. Patients with high LAND had a significant increased risk to develop LVI (P =.00123; coef ficient of regression [CR7 0.27) and lymph node metastasis (P =.00233), independent of the tumor's histology. During a follow-up of 52 months, patients with high LMVD had a significantly reduced overall survival (OS; P <.001; 5-year OS 30% vs 54%) and disease-free survival (DES; P <.001; 5-year DES 28% vs 48%). OS (P <.001; 5-year OS 14% vs 60%) and DES (P <.001; 5-year DES 14% vs 49%) were significantly reduced in patients with present LVI. In invasive cancer LMVD was significantly increased compared with precursor lesions (P =.008). The amount of ISR correlated significantly with LMVD. Conclusion. Our data provide evidence for a clinically significant role of specific lymphangiogenesis in esophageal cancer. Patients with high lymphangiogenic tumor activity represent candidates for lymphangiogenesis-associated therapies. (Surgery 2013;153:526-34.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据