4.4 Article

First principles investigation of water adsorption and charge transfer on III-V(110) semiconductor surfaces

期刊

SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 622, 期 -, 页码 71-82

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2013.12.007

关键词

Density functional theory; III-V semiconductor surfaces; GaAs(110); GaSb(110); InAs(110); Water adsorption

资金

  1. CERDEC Director's Innovation Funding (CDIF) initiative
  2. U.S. Army Research Laboratory
  3. DOD High Performance Computing Modernization Program at the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory DoD Supercomputing Resource Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a DFT/GGA study of water adsorption and charge transfer at the relaxed (110) surfaces of several III-V binary semiconductors: GaAs, GaSb, and InAs. Our calculations are the first to show that adsorption of dissociated water changes the (110) surface structure. The characteristic III-V bond rotation through an angle of 30 is reversed. The buckled III-V bond at the semiconductor/water interface rotates into the surface through a new angle, which we calculate to be approximately 11 degrees on all three binaries. Only dissociation of water - as opposed to chemisorption or physisorption - leads to this pseudo-unrelaxed configuration. We calculate geometries and reaction energies for several different adsorption mechanisms and find that molecular adsorption is the most favorable. We are able to reproduce binding configurations and energies for known adsorption sites on GaAs(110), but we also show new calculations for water on GaSb(110) and InAs(110). Lastly, we calculate the shift in electronic work function and induced surface dipole moment due to adsorbed water. We show that shifts in work function maximize at 1 ML of water, consistent with previous experimental works. Analysis of the partial charges and electron density reveals that adsorption of water polarizes the (110) surface, leading to local charge transfer across the semiconductor/water interface. Published by Elsevier BM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据