4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of low temperature hydrogen peroxide gas on sterilization and cytocompatibility of porous poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 202, 期 22-23, 页码 5762-5767

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.114

关键词

PLGA scaffold; Tissue engineering; Structural deformation; Sterilization; Hydrogen peroxide gas; Human articular chondrocytes

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2005-00117, 핵06B3604] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biodegradable poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) has been widely used as a scaffold in tissue engineering due to its excellent biocompatibility. However, PLGA scaffolds become structurally deformed during the sterilization process since they were hydrolytically unstable. In this study, the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas (HPG) were investigated on the deformation, sterilization and cytocompatibility of porous PLGA scaffolds and compared with those of ethylene oxide (EO) gas. Also, the effects of HPG treatment on the cellular responses of human articular chondrocytes were examined. HPG treatment resulted in neither deformation of PLGA nor its chemical modification, different from EO gas treatment. PLGA scaffolds inoculated with diverse strains of microorganisms were completely sterilized by HPG treatment. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of residual HPG occurring upon HPG treatment completely decreased as ventilation time increased. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the proliferation and glycosaminoglycan synthesis of chondrocytes between EO gas-treated and HPG-treated PLGA scaffolds. These results suggest that HPG can be used as an alternative method for sterilizing Various polymeric scaffolds and medical devices without structural deformation. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据