4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

High-performance phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes prepared using an amorphous indium zinc oxide anode film grown by box cathode sputtering

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 203, 期 5-7, 页码 652-656

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.137

关键词

IZO; OLED; BCS; Work function; Anode; ITO

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2006-331-D00243] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation and characteristics of amorphous indium zinc oxide (a-IZO) anode films grown using a plasma damage-free box cathode sputtering (BCS) technique for use in phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) is described. The electrical, optical, structural, and surface properties of the a-IZO anode, which was prepared by BCS at room temperature, were comparable to those of commercial ITO anode films. In addition, the work function of the ozone-treated a-IZO anode (5.23 +/- 0.01 eV) was much higher than that of an ozone-treated commercial ITO anode (4.95 +/- 0.01 eV). Due to high work function and transmittance of the BCS-grown a-IZO anode, Ir(ppy)(3)-doped phosphorescent OLED prepared on the BCS-grown a-IZO, anode films showed identical or better electrical and optical properties than OLEDs prepared on a commercial ITO anode film. In particular, both the quantum efficiency (16.3%) and power efficiency (40.7 lm/W) of the Ir(ppy)(3)-doped phosphorescent OLED fabricated on the amorphous IZO anode film was much higher than the quantum efficiency (12.4%) and power efficiency (30.1 lm/W) of an OLED with a commercial ITO anode. This indicates that a-IZO anode prepared by BCS technique affords OILED performance that rivals or exceeds that of devices fabrication with commercial ITO anode, even though it was prepared at room temperature. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据