4.6 Article

A prospective study of characteristics and outcomes of bacteremia in patients with solid organ or hematologic malignancies

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 2521-2526

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1816-5

关键词

Resistance; Tumor; Cancer; Neutropenia; Blood stream infection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the epidemiology and outcomes of bacteremia in patients with hematologic or solid organ malignancies cared for at the University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece. This prospective study was conducted during a 4-year period (2007-2011). Patients with bacterial and fungal blood stream infections were followed until discharge. Mortality was the primary outcome, while duration of hospitalization, relapses, time to relapse, and defervescence were the secondary outcomes. Ninety-nine patients with neoplasia (104 episodes) were included. Bacteremia developed mainly in patients with hematologic malignancies (56 %). Secondary bacteremias due to respiratory and urinary tract infections were most commonly identified. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominantly isolated pathogens (65 %); Pseudomonas spp. was the most common cause (19 %), followed closely by E. coli (18 %) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17 %). In-hospital mortality was 26.2 %. No differences in mortality were seen among patients in different subgroups according to isolated bacteria (according to Gram's stain, species, or number of isolated bacteria in positive cultures), hematologic or solid organ malignancy, neutropenia, and primary or secondary bacteremia. However, patients with bacteremia due to extensively drug resistant bacteria had higher mortality than patients with bacteremia due to multidrug resistant or susceptible pathogens. Patients required a prolonged period of hospitalization (21.8 +/- 14.9 days), which was complicated with relapses or reinfections in another body site in 27 % of them. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominantly isolated pathogens from patients with cancer in our population. The overall mortality remains high.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据