4.6 Article

An evaluation on the neuropsychological tests used in the assessment of postchemotherapy cognitive changes in breast cancer survivors

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 1361-1375

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1445-4

关键词

Oncology; Cancer; Chemotherapy; Cognitive function; Neuropsychological

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The choice of appropriate neuropsychological tests is important in evaluating the onset, severity, duration, and site of cognitive changes in postchemotherapy breast cancer survivors. This literature review is designed to evaluate and provide a summary of suitable neuropsychological tests to determine cognitive changes in breast cancer survivors. A literature search restricted to publications in English before June 2011 was performed using the following combination of keywords: neuropsychological assessments, breast cancer, chemotherapy, and cognitive impairment. Only observational studies that performed cognitive assessments on breast cancer survivors were included. The neuropsychological assessments were grouped as objective (traditional batteries and screening tests), subjective, or computerized. Of the 43 studies extracted, memory (88 %) and attention/concentration (88 %) are the two most commonly assessed domains. A majority (63 %) employed the use of Wechsler Adult Intelligent Scale (an objective test), while only 49 % incorporated subjective assessments to assess perceived cognitive impairment. Computerized tests received low popularity (28 %) despite their numerous advantages, which include overcoming the language- and cultural-dependent limitations of traditional objective tests. In the selection of a suitable neuropsychological tool to determine the onset, severity, site, and duration of cognitive changes in breast cancer survivors, incorporation of both subjective and objective tests is essential to facilitate a comprehensive assessment. With more validation work performed in future studies, it may be feasible to employ computerized neuropsychological assessments in both clinical and research settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据