4.5 Article

Point-contact spectroscopic studies on normal and superconducting AFe2As2-type iron pnictide single crystals

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/23/5/054009

关键词

-

资金

  1. US DoE through the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory [DEFG02-07ER46453]
  2. Center for Micro-analysis of Materials at UIUC
  3. NSF [DMR 07-06013]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [10874146, 10934005]
  5. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB929104]
  6. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [ZJNSF R0690113]
  7. Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, DOE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy is applied to investigate the gap structure in iron pnictide single-crystal superconductors of the AFe(2)As(2) (A = Ba, Sr) family ('Fe-122'). The observed point-contact junction conductance curves, G(V), can be divided into two categories: one where Andreev reflection is present for both (Ba0.6K0.4) Fe2As2 and Ba(Fe0.9Co0.1)(2)As-2, and the other with a V-2/3 background conductance universally observed, extending even up to 100 meV for Sr0.6Na0.4Fe2As2 and Sr(Fe0.9Co0.1)(2)As-2. The latter is also observed in point-contact junctions on the nonsuperconducting parent compound BaFe2As2 and superconducting (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2 crystals. Mesoscopic phase-separated coexistence of magnetic and superconducting orders is considered to explain distinct behaviors in the superconducting samples. For Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2, double peaks due to Andreev reflection with a strongly sloping background are frequently observed for point contacts on freshly cleaved c-axis surfaces. If normalized using a background baseline and analyzed using the Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk model, the data show a gap size of similar to 3.0-4.0 meV with 2 Delta(0)/k(B)T(c)similar to 2.0-2.6, consistent with the smaller gap size reported for the LnFeAsO family ('Fe-1111'). For the Ba(Fe0.9Co0.1)(2)As-2, the G(V) curves typically display a zero-bias conductance peak.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据