期刊
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 160-166出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.004
关键词
Newton; Substance; Action at a distance; Space; Matter; Empiricism
This paper is a critical response to Hylarie Kochiras' Gravity and Newton's substance counting problem, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (2009) 267-280. First, the paper argues that Kochiras conflates substances and beings; it proceeds to show that Newton is a substance monist. The paper argues that on methodological grounds Newton has adequate resources to respond to the metaphysical problems diagnosed by Kochiras. Second, the paper argues against the claim that Newton is committed to two speculative doctrines attributed to him by Kochiras and earlier Andrew Janiak: i) the passivity of matter and ii) the principle of local causation. Third, the paper argues that while Kochiras' (and Janiak's) arguments about Newton's metaphysical commitments are mistaken, it qualifies the characterization of Newton as an extreme empiricist as defended by Howard Stein and Rob DiSalle. In particular, the paper shows that Newton's empiricism was an intellectual and developmental achievement that built on non trivial speculative commitments about the nature of matter and space. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据