期刊
Cognition Technology & Work
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 179-183出版社
SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-015-0324-4
关键词
Situation awareness; Safety; Accident analysis
资金
- EPSRC [EP/K00915X/1, EP/I036222/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I036222/1, EP/K00915X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
This commentary is a response to Dekker's insightful article in this issue on situation awareness (SA). This is a concept that continues to excite strong debate but only because of the profound implications for the theoretical foundations and the effects that different approaches have for the work of human factors practitioners. We argue that Dekker's paper tacitly adopts one approach to SA, and in doing so will inevitably arrive at the point of questioning the concept in its entirety. If SA really is as deterministic and 'broken component' orientated as Dekker describes, then we would be in complete agreement, but instead we offer a counterpoint. We apply our distributed situation awareness approach to the key issues raised, answer all of Dekker's concerns, and offer a useful way forward.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据