4.0 Article

Magnetostratigraphy and fold tests from Raika peina and Peina v Bortu caves (Classical Karst, Slovenia)

期刊

STUDIA GEOPHYSICA ET GEODAETICA
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 27-48

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11200-010-0002-1

关键词

palaeomagnetism; rock-magnetic properties; cave sediments; speleothems; Quaternary; Dinaric karst

资金

  1. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [GAAVCR IAA300130701, GAAVCR IAA3013201]
  2. Institutional Research Plan of the Institute of Geology AS CR [CEZ AV0Z30130516]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
  4. Slovenian Ministry of Education, Sport and Science [13-2005-06, MEB 090619, MEB 090908]
  5. Ministry of Science of Slovenia
  6. Slovenian Research Agency [P6-0119-0618, P0-0119]
  7. [J6-3035-0618-01]
  8. [J6-6345-0618-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clastic and chemogenic cave sediments were sampled and analyzed from Raika peina and Peina v Bortu caves of southwestern Slovenia. Samples were subjected to both thermal and alternating field demagnetization; specimens belonging to the same sample of the same layer produce identical results. Unblocking temperatures of 540 to 560A degrees C on average suggests magnetite as the principal carrier of magnetization. These directions also pass a reversals test indicating the demagnetization results are free of secondary overprints and have adequately averaged out paleosecular variation. Normally magnetized clays containing fauna belonging to the MN17 mammal biozone at a depth of similar to 4 m in Raika pecina cave indicate these clays were deposited at the beginning of the Olduvai subchron (1.95 Ma). Correlation with the Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale (GPTS) indicates the base of the speleothems in Raika peina terminate in the upper part of subchron C2An.3n with numerous breaks in deposition, lasting up to 250 ka and more. Therefore rates of speleothem growth cannot be calculated. Fold tests on dome-like stalagmites of differing sizes and ages (Pleistocene, Pliocene) from the two caves indicate the domelike structures are primary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据