4.7 Article

Uncertainty analysis of system identification results obtained for a seven-story building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table

期刊

STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 466-483

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1577

关键词

system identification; variability in modal parameters; uncertainty quantification

资金

  1. Englekirk Center Industry Advisory Board
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  3. Engineering Institute
  4. Department of Civil Engineering of the Universidade Nova de Lisboa
  5. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [BD/17266/2004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A full-scale seven-story reinforced concrete building section/slice was tested on the Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) shake table at the University of California San Diego during the period of October 2005 to January 2006. Three output-only system identification methods were used to extract the modal parameters (natural frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes) of the test structure at different damage states. In this study, the performance of these system identification methods is investigated in two cases: (Case I) when these methods are applied to the measured dynamic response of the structure and (Case II) when these methods are applied to the dynamic response of the structure simulated using a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model thereof. In both cases, the uncertainty/variability of the identified modal parameters due to the variability of several input factors is quantified through analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition to ANOVA, meta-models are used for effect screening in Case II (based on the simulated data), which also capture the effects of linear interactions of the input factors. The four input factors considered in Case I are amplitude of input excitation, spatial density of measurements, length of response data used for system identification, and model order used in the parametric system identification methods. In the second case of uncertainty analysis, in addition to these four input factors, measurement noise is also considered. The results show that for all three methods considered, the amplitude of excitation is the most significant factor explaining the variability of the identified modal parameters, especially the natural frequencies. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据