4.7 Article

Long-Term Stimulation of Neural Progenitor Cell Migration After Cortical Ischemia in Mice

期刊

STROKE
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 3559-U344

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.627802

关键词

cortical ischemia; doublecortin; long-term migration; neural progenitors; neurogenesis

资金

  1. Vetenskapsradet
  2. Hjarnfonden
  3. Vinnova
  4. Stroke-Riksforbundet
  5. Agreement concerning Research and Education of Medical Doctors (LUA-ALF)
  6. Soderberg-Stiftelsen
  7. Arbetsmarknadens Forsakringsaktiebolag (AFA)
  8. Sten A Olsson foundation for Research and Culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Cortical ischemia induces neural progenitor cell migration toward the injury site; however, whether these cells are capable of maintaining the migratory response for a longer period after injury remains uncertain. Methods-We analyzed progenitor migration up to 1 year after induction of photothrombotic stroke to the mouse neocortex. Migrating progenitors identified as doublecortin positive cells (DCX+) were assessed using the immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. The thymidine analogues chlorodeoxyuridine and iododeoxyuridine were used to birth-date the progenitor cells. Results-In the striatum, we detected elevated numbers of DCX+ cells up to 6 weeks postlesion. In the corpus callosum and the peri-infarct cortex (Ctx), DCX+ cell numbers were increased up to 1 year. The orientation of the migrating progenitors was mostly aligned with the corpus callosum fiber tract at all time points; however, in the Ctx, they aligned parallel to the infarct border. The injured cortex continuously receives new progenitors up to 1 year after lesion. Cells born after lesion did not become mature neurons, although a portion of the migrating progenitors showed initial signs of differentiation into neurons. Conclusions-Neural progenitors might have a role in brain plasticity after cortical stroke, especially considering the prolonged window of migratory responses of up to 1 year after stroke lesion. (Stroke. 2011;42:3559-3565.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据