4.7 Article

PKCδ-Induced PU.1 Phosphorylation Promotes Hematopoietic Stem Cell Differentiation to Dendritic Cells

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 297-306

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/stem.564

关键词

Hematopoietic stem cells; Differentiation; Signal transduction; Dendritic cell; Myelopoiesis; Transcription factors; *PU.1

资金

  1. German BMBF [0312113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) exhibit the potential to differentiate into a variety of specialized blood cells. The distinct intracellular mechanisms that control cell fate and lineage commitment of these multipotent cells are not well defined. In this study, we investigate and modulate the signaling processes during HSC differentiation toward myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs). DC differentiation induced by the cytokines Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and Interleukin-4 (IL-4) led to activation of the Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK), protein kinase C (PKC), and Janus kinase (JAK)/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) but not the SAPK/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. From the activated signaling pathways the PKC isoform delta was found to phosphorylate the transcription factor PU.1, which is described as one of the key factors for myeloid HSC differentiation. On molecular level, PKC delta regulated PU.1 activity by affecting its transactivation activity, whereas its DNA binding activity remained unaffected. This was accompanied by PKC delta-induced phosphorylation of the PU.1 transactivation domain. Furthermore, treatment with PKC- and ERK1/2-specific signaling inhibitors impaired both HSC differentiation toward mDCs as well as phosphorylation-mediated transactivation activity of PU.1. Taken together, these results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms promoting the differentiation process of HSCs toward mDCs and introduce the PKC isoform delta as critical mediator. STEM CELLS 2011;29:297-306

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据